[haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: "David McPaul" <dlmcpaul@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:07:44 +1000
On 2008-08-27, Mat Hounsell <mat_geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The following contains opinion and code dependencies; there is no point
> arguing.
>
> I would like to see both the GCC4 libraries and compiler included on the DR1.
> But I'm not going to sulk if they are not.
The debate was about whether we should compile Haiku with GCC4 instead of GCC2.
Including GCC 4 libraries and compiler in addition to GCC2 libraries
and compiler on DR1 is a seperate issue.
It is at this stage important I believe for Haiku to be build using
GCC2 until such time as we are fully capable of self hosting the build
process on Haiku.
I have no other option but to use GCC2 to build Haiku. If we switch
to GCC4 then I am up the creek without a paddle.
--
Cheers
David
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Maurice Kalinowski
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Maurice Kalinowski
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- From: Mat Hounsell