[haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: "Urias McCullough" <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:33:55 -0700
2008/8/13 David McPaul <dlmcpaul@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 2008-08-14, Urias McCullough <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2008/8/13 David McPaul <dlmcpaul@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > My preference is that we refrain from changing to GCC4 until haiku is
>> > self hosting.
>>
>> /me looks at his gcc2-compiled self-hosted partition
>
> My understanding is that without the VM changes Haiku can only self
> host with lots of memory.
Ah, fair enough. I have 1gb on my test box currently.
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Bruno Albuquerque
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Nick
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Urias McCullough
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: David McPaul
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Urias McCullough
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: David McPaul
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- » [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Bruno Albuquerque
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Nick
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Urias McCullough
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: David McPaul
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: Urias McCullough
- [haiku-development] Re: GCC 2 x GCC 4.
- From: David McPaul