[haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features
- From: Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:55:02 +0200
Hi Chris, On 2009-07-27 at 23:41:18 [+0200], Chris Peel <chris.gsi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there a way the devs (I'm guessing Axel, yourself, etc.) could assign > some form of 'likelihood' rating against each item? For example, I'm > guessing adding WLAN support might be 90% achievable while "New File > System" might be much harder and therefore only 20% achievable (bad > examples, I know). Maybe the dev(s) who's most likely to tackle the new > feature could add the rating and it could be adjusted over time. > > This would then give (a) the request submitter and (b) lurkers like > myself a view on how likely their request is going to appear in which > release. > > Just a thought - it might be too onerous to maintain. Ah ok, this was perhaps not very clear. With the "unscheduled" list, it was like "we definitely want these", or in another words "100% likelyhood", but we have no idea when anyone will get around to implementing them. So the basic idea was that we could make point releases after R1 wheneever one or more of these features from the unscheduled list would become available. Having a rating or even voting system to stress the importance of some feature over another would not make it appear sooner. It would just give a false impression and/or make promises we are unlikely to be able to keep. Best regards, -Stephan
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features
- From: Chris Peel
- [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features
- References:
- [haiku-development] Future Haiku Features
- From: Stephan Assmus
- [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features
- From: Chris Peel
- [haiku-development] Future Haiku Features
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] Future Haiku Features - Stephan Assmus
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Chris Peel
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Stephan Assmus
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - scott mc
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Chris Peel
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Gerald Zajac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - PulkoMandy
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - David McPaul
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - PulkoMandy
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Stephan Assmus
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Christoph .J Thompson
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Michael Crawford
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - PulkoMandy
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - scott mc
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Izomiac
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Brecht Machiels
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Brecht Machiels
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - scott mc
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - scott mc
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Stephan Assmus
- » [haiku-development] Re: Future Haiku Features - Axel Dörfler