Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Wouldn't adding another type of event (like B_ENTRY_MOVED) for > > queries > > make sense? > That could be done, yes. A notify_query_entry_moved() would need to be > added > and all file systems supporting live queries would need to be > adjusted to > call it. So what do we agree on? When using a live query, chances are very high that you want to monitor the file in question, anyway. Since the entry didn't change wrt the query, I would find it cleaner to keep that separated. Introducing B_ENTRY_MOVED would also require userland apps to support this (unlike my previous B_ENTRY_REMOVED/B_ENTRY_ADDED hack). Bye, Axel.