Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2008-04-17 at 22:36:06 [+0200], Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I'd be interested in comments on that topic before applying > > anything > > though. Is my understanding of the problem correct at all, do we > > care > > about those optimizations and how would others suggest we move > > forward > > with that? > As far as I can judge, your understanding of the problem is correct, > and > disabling strict aliasing sounds like the best choice ATM (unless > someone > volunteers to review and fix all code, of course). +1 Bye, Axel.