Am 28.03.2014 um 02:12 schrieb François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>: > That's news to me, last I heard SecureBoot was mandatory on ARM... They had it mandatory on both, but changed the requirements for x86. I don't think ARM is relevant anyway, as there's almost nothing running Windows RT, and only those systems would be affected. It's also not different to other systems where the bootloader is locked, which is the even the case for most Android devices. There's SecureBoot like it's in the UEFI specification, and there's what Microsoft made out of it. You can install your own certificates or you can disable it, that's your choice ;). But anyway, that never was the topic. It was only a side-effect of the design that it would allow us to fulfill the SecureBoot requirements. And it was most certainly never the stated goal. -- Jonathan