On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jason Whitehorn > <jason.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I do understand and appreciate the stance of saying "your program's > busted" > > in this case. No need for Haiku to program around a busted program. I > > completely agree. > > > > Thank you all for your time. > > I do want to say that we welcome these sort of discussions, bug > reports, and patches, even if in the end the current code is OK. So I > don't want you to feel discouraged! In fact checking low-level things > like this is especially valuable since not many people can work at > that level. > > In fact I'm sure there are plenty more bugs where your eye and skills > could be useful, so please keep looking around and testing things in > Haiku! > > -- > Regards, > Ryan > > Thank you. I do not feel discouraged, but your encouragement is... well, encouraging :-) I do like what you guys are doing with Haiku, and very much want to get involved... I will continue trying to find areas to improve.