I'm sorry to feed this out of place discussion, but I do care too much as to simply disregard such statements. On Mon, 25 May 2009 09:00:09 +1000, Rob Judd wrote > It's time to get serious about reliability. I'm not the project > manager here (in fact, who is since M. Phipps left?) but if I were > and some developer told me to build in Linux I'd tear him a new asshole. That's just plain stupid. Aside from the wording, it makes no sense. First of all, what do you think everyone's doing? Do you think we find it OK that there are reliability issues and that we just don't care? Has it occured to you that the current reliability issues may be hard to track down because they are difficult to reproduce? I'm sure that everyone wants a reliable system, but as you've undoubtedly experienced, in some situations it is more reliable than others. The suggestion to use Linux to build was a well meant one, indicating that for your case and for the reason of not hindering your productivity, it'd probably be easier to use Linux as a host until the issues you experience have been identified and fixed. It certainly didn't mean "oh, you know, we don't actually have an interest in making our system reliable, just use Linux instead". From what you've written so far it comes across as if you are quite an experienced developer. So you certainly have the ability to track the issue down and fix it. That'd be really helpful, as obviously you're able to reproduce the issue more easily than everyone else. But if you're not interested in tracking it down, then please don't start demanding a fix from others for a problem they aren't able to reproduce. If we were employed and payed developers and you were the boss then you'd be in a situation where this could work. But in our situation you either track it down yourself or report the issue in so much detail that others are able to find a way to reproduce or even find a solution. If this is not possible, because you don't have that kind of info ("it just happens after some time"), this is a pitty, but no-ones fault, not yours and not the one of others. But if this is the case, then you simply can't start demanding or accusing others. The only thing that this kind of behaviour results in, IMO, is that people get pissed off. I certainly know that I'm starting to get pissed off and I wouldn't be surprised if others felt the same. And pissing off developers is not something I'd consider a good way to move Haiku forward. > But then, as everyone keeps pointing out, I'm not a nice person. ;-) I just don't get why you are acting like this in the first place. Wouldn't it be easier to just be constructive instead of being a PITA? I mean if you really are so much of a better developer than anyone else, so much that no-one could teach you anything, then you certainly don't need us to fix all remaining issues in Haiku. If not, then why don't you accept the fact that others may know something better than you (maybe because they wrote the code in the first place or because they are simply using Haiku for a much longer time). In this case a little respect would go a long way. Regards Michael