[haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:12:20 +0200 CEST
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'd be all for it, too. I guess you suggest to enable the "shopt -s
> > huponexit" by default?
> Well, either that or change the SIGHUP handling to leave existing
> jobs
> alone. I actually tend towards liking that stuff I fire up into the
> background survives closing the terminal (as under BeOS). It would
> also
> avoid risking data loss (imagine you started an editor into the
> background). But I suppose it mainly depends on what you're used
> to...
Since other shells obviously don't do this, I would consider it a
fixable quirk of bash. IOW I would bash do the same wether it has been
killed or not, that would give us the consistency back; also, "shopt -s
huponexit" could change the behaviour of both, too.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- » [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- [haiku-development] Re: Bash and Jobs
- From: Ingo Weinhold