[haiku-development] Re: BString on GCC4

Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I suppose we should rather get rid of the non-const version 
> completely and 
> introduce a SetByteAt[Unchecked]() or something like this. Since 
> BStringRef 
> is not inline, the operator call is unnecessarily expensive.

+1 - with GCC 4, we don't need to maintain source or binary 
compatibility in this regard, so I'm in favour of dropping it, too.


Other related posts: