IMO... now that we use git, which enables a multi-commit push, it may
be better for everyone
1) for us to commit minorly flawed patches with signoff. (whitespace,
nomenclature, general style issues as opposed to implementation flaws)
2) followed up by the committer making the minor changes and pushing
it in one hrev
3) following up on the source of the patch (Trac, mailing list, GCI,
GSoC, etc.) with a link to the the committer's corrections to show how
it should be done.
To me, that seems a better use of time than a committer pointing out
the minor issues with a patch, waiting for a periodic contributor to
respond, only for the cycle to possibly continue.
