Michael Lotz wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> Stephan Assmus wrote: >> >>> Perfect. That's great news. >>> >>> How many days does the spreading of the final image to the mirrors >>> really >>> take? We could still try to aim for the 14th and only slip a little >>> if the >>> ATA fixes don't make it in time for spreading the image. >>> >> I understand that we wanted to give time to address some of the ATA >> issues and I really don't care if we delay the release a few days (or >> even a week or two for that matter). But we can't just be sitting >> here >> in uncertainty waiting and waiting (we also have a live, if you know >> what I mean). >> >> So, is it too much to ask that a decision be made once and for all on >> a >> firm release date? >> > > I've been discussing with Marcus and he'd be OK with releasing the > alpha with the current ATA stack. I've added a section concerning ATA > and disabling DMA as a possible way to get around it to the release > notes wiki page. Ah, too bad a fix didn't make it for #4058. I tested with DMA disabled and it indeed boots (latest rev). Note that the installer from cd boots with DMA on (albeit making a long, in minutes, pause on the 4th icon) but DriveSetup won't show any existing partitions from the harddrive. With DMA off, it waits indefinitely on the 4th icon. All in all, i can't install from CD on that machine (my CD is a few revisions old, will do more tests today). It's hard to evaluate how many people will be affected by that, but it's kind of a show stopper here. Regards, Alex