> Um, vim is not analogous to MS-DOS Editor, in case that needed > pointing out. (By the way, Windows is also no longer based on MS-DOS). > Of course not, I know it is much more capable; my analogies were all very loose. I only compared it to MS-DOS Editor because from the standpoint of a desktop user, they would serve approximately the same purpose. For the record I have nothing against vim. I was only commenting that this is a really great GUI OS, and we can come up with a really great IDE for it. Given my perspective of vim as an "emergency" editor, I was just surprised that so many people were concerned about it. Of course I suppose that is not unexpected: people get attached to their text editor, and you can claw mine out of my dead, cold, hands. :-)