> lpe? Never noticed it! Will check it out eventually. > > As for nano, um, I still have weird feelings about the whole nano vs > vim situation and I usually refrain myself from saying anything on > this subject, since my message saying that the first thing I usually > do when using a Unix-like workstation is to install nano (even locally > to my user) was kind of the catalyst for the discussion that > culminated in replacing vi for nano as the included CLI editor... Oops, I hope I didn't dredge anything up. If it comes up again I propose to take the .c files from nano, the .h files from vim, and just be done with it. If that doesn't work we can call it a compiler bug and pass the problem on to the gcc people.