--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Humdinger <humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How's the policy of releasing such "derived" work? > Originally it was a > BeNewsletter by Seth Flexman, revised somehow by Hartmuth > Reh and now > wonderfully improved by moi. :) > What kind of license should I use? Be Sample Code? A dual > license like > Be Sample c1999 and MIT c2010? > IANAL, but isn't the Be Sample Code License (1) the same as the BSD 3-clause(2) license? I see no reason to re-license a work derived from Be Sample/BSD 3-clause licensed code. (1) http://www.ohloh.net/licenses/be-sample-code (2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#3-clause_license_.28.22New_BSD_License.22.29 -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?