On 2010-07-01 at 22:39:06 [+0200], Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The point is that you know exactly when it's missing, because that > > would always be a GCC2 Hybrid build. Sorry for being unclear about > > that. > > Ahh, I thought you meant removing it in all cases. Problem solved then :) Just to throw in another option: The additional info could be moved to a tool tip. That could also be done for the "inaccessible memory". CU, Ingo