[haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: "Rene Gollent" <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:43:37 -0500
>
> > I noticed real_time_clock_usecs() returns a bigtime_t but doesn't make
> > that call.
>
> It's not a syscall though. If it were, it would have the prefix "_user_".
>
I wondered about that too, but I notice it's defined as a system call
in kernel/OS.h, but could find no _user_ equivalent for it, so I
assumed it was used for that as well.
Thanks for the clarification,
Rene
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [haiku-development] 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Rene Gollent
- [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [haiku-development] 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Rene Gollent
- [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Ingo Weinhold