[haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:03:25 +0100
On 2008-03-22 at 06:07:25 [+0100], Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm curious, does any syscall that returns a 64-bit value have to call
> syscall_64_bit_return_value(); first?
Yep.
> I noticed real_time_clock_usecs() returns a bigtime_t but doesn't make
> that call.
It's not a syscall though. If it were, it would have the prefix "_user_".
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Rene Gollent
- References:
- [haiku-development] 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Rene Gollent
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- » [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- [haiku-development] Re: 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Rene Gollent
- [haiku-development] 64-bit syscalls in real_time_clock.c
- From: Rene Gollent