Wednesday, September 10, 2014 at 9:24 AM, "Jessica Hamilton" <jessica.l.hamilton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > BeOS R5 binary compatibility? It's pointless. > > Whether it is or not is irrelevant. This is our stated goal, and we're > sticking to it for R1. Sticking to it, no matter what, even as decades are starting to pass by? From your sentence above, I conclude that you would stick to this goal even if you did indeed think it was irrelevant, because after all, it IS a goal. I hope this logic isn't prevalent in the project... Cheers m.a