Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2011-03-03 at 23:35:35 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > I think for GCC it makes some sense, as it's a GCC flavor that only > > produces Haiku executables. > Huh? Every compiler I know only produces binaries for a single target. > AFAICS, that's not the reason why one is supposed to add a specific > hint to > the version, but it's because we have applied haiku-specific patches > to > gcc-2.95.3 that aren't available anywhere else (so the compiler > behaves > differently). True enough, I was mostly thinking about the cross compiler anyway; there it's nice to know what it is for. > > I guess the SuSE way would be enough, > > though, but some sort of designation sounds like a good idea to me. > Ok, I appended " (Haiku)" in r40802. Alright, thanks. Bye, Axel.