[haiku-commits] Re: r40783 - haiku/branches/features/package-management
- From: John Scipione <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:40:30 -0500
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2011-03-02 at 22:32:13 [+0100], François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > -haikuRequiredLegacyGCCVersion="2.95.3-haiku-100818"
> > > +haikuRequiredLegacyGCCVersion="2.95.3-110228"
> > > export haikuRequiredLegacyGCCVersion
> > > # version of legacy gcc required to build haiku
> >
> > Shouldn't we keep it as long as it's not an official port with upstreamed
> > patches ?
>
> Why should we? It's neither being maintained upstream nor do we declare any
> other of our ports this way.
>
What about Jam, doesn't that have a Haiku designation? And it isn't
maintained upstream. I think the Haiku designation indicates that it is not
a stock gcc2 release.
John Scipione
Other related posts:
