> Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2010-07-19 at 18:23:47 [+0200], Adrien Destugues > > <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Why is this class giving you problems ? Moving the members out of > > > it > > > would make the namespace more polluted (4 identifiers instead of > > > only > > > the class name), and I don't see what problem it could solve ... > > I was only referring to the symbol visibility here. The existence > > of > > the > > class is another matter. It just seems useless to me -- a visible > > implementation detail, if you want. I don't see why the methods > > can't > > simply live in BCatalog (or BLocaleRoster). That would definitely > > feel more > > natural to the API user. > > FWIW, I completely agree with Ingo here. Yes, I get it now with the detailed explanations. I'll move things around tonight or tomorrow. -- Adrien