On 2010-06-07 at 10:01:38 [+0200], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2010-06-06 at 18:01:52 [+0200], Humdinger <humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > 2010/6/6, Wim van der Meer <wpjvandermeer@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > When I started to look at it I found one potential problem. It > > > > seems > > > > that application signatures are not case sensitive. If that is > > > > true > > > > then either the signature needs to be different from the > > > > executable > > > > name, or we'll need to go for the "screenshooter" idea. What is > > > > acceptable? > > > First off, thanks for your great work on the Screenshot app! > > > Now the only missing things are a bilinear filtered preview (see > > > ShowImage) and maybe an additional slider to set the delay. :) > > The filtering comes for free when passing B_FILTER_BITMAP_BILINEAR as > > additional options argument to DrawBitmap(). For downscaling, there > > are > > better algorithms, bilinear scaling only looks good at a factor above > > 0.5. > > But it's a start. > > That also means that we can remove the bilinear code from ShowImage, > right? Yes, absolutely. The other day I was downloading images off of a Canon I borrowed, which I got to work on the third try with PhotoGrabber (very useful app, but can be improved a lot, unfortunately does not compile out of the box). Then I went on to select and sort photos, but ShowImage was quite a pain to use. When you rename a photo, there is no node-monitoring and consequently you can't navigate to the next/previous image anymore. Same if you move a photo to another folder (in which case I'd prefer to navigate to the next/previous image in the *old* folder anyway). Somehow the workings of the window size is also annoying. I'd prefer it to remember the last size. So lots of room for improvement with some simple changes... if only I had more time. Best regards, -Stephan