----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart McCoy" <stubear@xxxxxxxxx> To: <openbeos-cdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:26 AM Subject: [openbeos-cdt] Re: Names > This is supposed to be the name of the OS itself. At a later date we could > perhaps ruminate on the naming of the seperate elements of the OS but much > like the look of the OS being derived from the identity, the names of the > core components should be derived from the name of the OS itself. Do you really think of renaming the OS? I think we should stick to "OpenBeOS" becouse people can re-recognize the good old BeOS. I will still know that OpenBeOS has a new name. But what about all the other BeOS user who even have not heared about OBOS? How will they know that XY is the new BeOS? > By the way, what about "Elemental" as a name? Sounds good. I like it. But the user could think that it is only an elemental OS and doesn't have many abilities... And (already said) think about the worth of re-recognition. Greetings Eckard