I was thinking of Be# (BeSharp), but the domainname is taken --- Kristof Polleunis aka BeAdingo <kristof_polleunis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - Well I simply can't be on the sessions coz they > are > too late! Hey, I live in Europe and I have a life, > girlfriend, kid, work, I'm not a student who can > stay > up until 3am to join you guys on IRC. > > -That's why I didn't like IRC in the first place. > Timezones make it difficult to set a perfect time > for > everyone. I guess that also explains why almost > nobody of the group showed up. > > -Using IRC is cool but people live in different > timezones and have sometimes other obligations: > sports, hobbies, friends and family...etc > > -I also wonder if everyone subscribed to the > mailinglist. Maybe all members should be urged to > subscribe > > - I did post these things several times on the > mailinglists but almost nobody gave feedback on it. > I > also suggested setting up a list with things to > avoid > and things to consider when choosing names. Result > no > reaction. > > BTW: I'd like to see some more professionalism > > regards, > > Kristof (BeAdingo) > > > > --- Nathan Callender <nathan_callender@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > Why didn't you bring this up over IRC *before* > > Stuart was going to submit names? There were > three > > sessions, and lots of time to post on the mailing > > list. > > Kristof Polleunis aka BeAdingo > > <kristof_polleunis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Boris, that .com suggestion was my idea ;-) > > > > I agree with Boris we are obviously not marketeers > > and > > that's why we forget to consider things, sometimes > > important stuff when choosing a name. I believe we > > should get in touch with the people who want to > > distribute the OS, like BeUnited (isn't Helmar a > > marketeer) to discuss these things. > > > > I believe there are many criteria to consider > before > > even submitting a name to Michael. These are just > a > > few I can come up with and I'm not an expert in > this > > field. > > > > - it has to be a non-existing OS-name. > > > > - it should more or less represent the OS or the > > community, it's a plus to the name this way. > > > > - it should not be an existing trademarked name > > (also > > applies to logo). > > > > - it should be trademark-able(also applies to > logo). > > > > - it should be possible to obtain a toplevel > > domainname like *.org,*.com,*.net > > > > - it should not have an insulting meaning in other > > cultures. > > > > - it should not be too long, too complicated or > > consist of multiple words. > > > > - not too geeky either (my personal view ;-). > > > > The name has to pass criteria tests like these. > > What's the point in having a flashy name if we > can't > > have the domainname or the trademark or if it's a > > infringment on a trademark. It's not just a matter > > of > > picking names at random. > > > > Everyone who suggests a name should first check if > > the > > names passes these criteria before even mentioning > > it. > > See what happend with BlueOS they had to change > > their > > name because BlueOS already existed. I think we > > better avoid things like this. > > > > Kristof Polleunis > > > > aka > > > > BeAdingo > > > > > > > > --- Boris Kuncer wrote: > > > > > > I think that we need help and advice of the > > > marketing expert. We are > > > here mostly because of a design and visual > stuff. > > I > > > think that choosing > > > and suggesting names is not where I'm good in. I > > can > > > tell you if I like > > > any name suggestion or if I do not like it. This > > is > > > only a vote. Process > > > of choosing a name or anything else in the > > beginning > > > of our job is more > > > complicated of simple 'I like it - I do not like > > > it'. We got here a > > > "product" to "sell". For example: when Mercedes > > have > > > new car, all > > > aspects of the industry is working in one > > > direction(designers, technical > > > department, advertising teams...), very good and > > > strong marketing > > > direction in purpose to sell the product. If you > > > want to sell your > > > product you have to first analyse market. You > have > > > to know what are > > > obligations and limitations before you came out > on > > > the market. One > > > limitations can be legal and other practical > (like > > > some one said that we > > > got to have free .com or .org). We can not make > > > mistakes like that. > > > Personally I do not know answers to all this > > things. > > > This why we need > > > help of someone who is professional advertising > > > expert. > > > > > > -boris > > > > > > > > > > > >I think everything has toned down a bit because > > the > > > work has > > > >become work instead of some sort of > free-for-all > > > art contest. > > > >Until a name can be chosen for the OS there is > > > little reason > > > >to work on any of the other design projects as > > they > > > all depend > > > >on the name. Even then, once a name is chosen, > an > > > identity > > > >will follow before the icons, wallpaper and GUI > > > elements can > > > >be tackled. > > > > > > > >To be honest, I've been a little disappointed > in > > > the turnout > > > >in the discussions concerning the name. Out of > a > > > forty some > > > >odd group, roughly a quarter of the people > > > participated in any > > > >meaningful way (including submissions to the > > > freelists mailing > > > >list). However, this being a volunteer project, > > > you take what > > > >you can get. > > > > > > > >I'm going to pass a list along to Michael with > my > > > > > >recommendations for a name and see what his > > > comments are. > > > >Hopefully by week's end I will know where this > > > group stands in > > > >relation to the work that needs to be done and > > > those who still > > > >wish to participate in this group will be given > > the > > > > > > >opportunity to contribute. > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: openbeos-cdt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >[mailto:openbeos-cdt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On > > > >Behalf Of Kristof > > > >Polleunis aka BeAdingo > > > >Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:31 AM > > > >To: Stuart McCoy > > > >Cc: openbeos-cdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >Subject: [openbeos-cdt] What's going on here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi everyone, > > > > > > > >What's going on. This was a vibrant group, lots > > of > > > >ideas where being discussed things started to > get > > > >moving and now I can't help getting the > > impression > > > >that everbody gives up on CDT. > > > > > > > >Are the discussions being held elsewhere? > > > Freelists > > > >is down, the forum is down and no info is > coming > > > in. > > > >To get the group back on tracks and get things > > > moving > > > >was why we had a change of teamlead or am I > > wrong? > > > >Why do I still have the impression that nothing > > > seems > > > >to happen and the internal communication has > > become > > > >worse? I'm not here to criticize anyone but I > > must > > > >see I'm worried and start to have my doubts > about > > > the > > > >CDT. > > > > > > > >regards, > > > > > > > >Kristof Polleunis > > > > > > > >(BeAdingo) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > > > >Do You Yahoo!? > > > >Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and > > > more > > > http://games.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and > more > > http://games.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===================================================== > > Nathan Callender > > nathan_callender@xxxxxxxxx > > > ===================================================== > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and > more > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more > http://games.yahoo.com/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/