Hi, Sorry to intrude on this, but I can understand people sometimes not wanting other people to 'interfere' with their code! I have to tell you, that the fact I develop these drivers, is only possible because noone interferes! I have to confirm every single 'bit' of code to be OK and as I want it to be, otherwise I will get lost in these woods within a matter of days... Of course, that could be my limitation, but it's also the reason why I can pull this off (no docs and such.. ;-) If someone would insist on also writing in the core of these drivers, I'd be keeping my own personal offline working copy, instead of using CVS/SVN. I'd have to (or just quit). Rudolf. > Axel D=F6rfler wrote: > > Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> About the update code... I would like you to stay aside. As I > > > said, > >>this is next on my list and I'm pretty sure you can find other > > > things > >>to do. > >> > >> Please, don't touch that code. > > > > How come=3F > > If you will get to it "in the next few weeks" (as you said earlier) > > and > > Stephan can do it next, why would you want to hold up development=3F > > That > > doesn't make any sense to me. > > I does to me. I wrote the clipping and invalidate code and made > update > code to =5Fshow something=5F knowing that this is not always correct, not > even talking > about optimal. Because the window manager was not ready, and I needed > that for the > update code to be complete, I went to write that too. I did some big > changes in > app=5Fserver when adding the new window manager, and I will be done > shortly > (a week, 2 max) and then resume work at update code. I don't really > see the point > Stephan getting in my way! There are other things to be done in > app=5Fserver. > > For you to be happy, let's change that into "the next couple > weeks". > > > Regards, > Adi. > >