[haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-appserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:15:13 +0100 CET
"DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Okay, but it's still current I assume and will be the way the
> > input_server talks with the app_server, right? :-)
> Yep. R5 used something used the BSession class to accomplish the same
> kind of task instead of BMessages.
According to Jérôme who has it working with the R5 and Dano
app_servers, they only use BMessages. Also, it seems to require a
protocol that sends messages in both directions.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-appserver] input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: DarkWyrm