[haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: "DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-appserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:48:26 -0500 EST
> "DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > the input_server is using the BPortLink class when built for
> > > Haiku.
> > > Is that still current? Or has it been replaced by the R5 method
> > > in
> > > the
> > > mean time?
> > >
> > > Also, since BPortLink is an example of this: don't introduce new
> > > classes into the global namespace if they aren't meant to be
> > > public.
> > > Please use the BPrivate namespace - that's what this one is for.
> > Not to worry, Axel. There is no intention of bringing that out into
> > the
> > public -- it's just that no one's put it into the BPrivate
> > namespace
> > yet. :)
>
> Okay, but it's still current I assume and will be the way the
> input_server talks with the app_server, right? :-)
Yep. R5 used something used the BSession class to accomplish the same
kind of task instead of BMessages.
--DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler
- References:
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-appserver] input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler