[haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-appserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:24:36 +0100 CET
"DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > the input_server is using the BPortLink class when built for Haiku.
> > Is that still current? Or has it been replaced by the R5 method in
> > the
> > mean time?
> >
> > Also, since BPortLink is an example of this: don't introduce new
> > classes into the global namespace if they aren't meant to be
> > public.
> > Please use the BPrivate namespace - that's what this one is for.
> Not to worry, Axel. There is no intention of bringing that out into
> the
> public -- it's just that no one's put it into the BPrivate namespace
> yet. :)
Okay, but it's still current I assume and will be the way the
input_server talks with the app_server, right? :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: DarkWyrm
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-appserver] input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: DarkWyrm
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: DarkWyrm