[haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: "DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-appserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:21:20 -0500 EST
> Hi there,
>
> the input_server is using the BPortLink class when built for Haiku.
> Is
> that still current? Or has it been replaced by the R5 method in the
> mean time?
>
> Also, since BPortLink is an example of this: don't introduce new
> classes into the global namespace if they aren't meant to be public.
> Please use the BPrivate namespace - that's what this one is for.
Not to worry, Axel. There is no intention of bringing that out into the
public -- it's just that no one's put it into the BPrivate namespace
yet. :)
--DW
- Follow-Ups:
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler
- References:
- [haiku-appserver] input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-appserver] input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- » [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- [haiku-appserver] Re: input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [haiku-appserver] input_server vs. BPortLink
- From: Axel Dörfler