[gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack

  • From: "Bobby Benninger" <bobby.benninger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:29:01 -0400

Ok - wouldn't Microsoft have thought of this when they wrote the MSI or no?

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Nelson, Jamie <Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Yeah, my bad. You can specify a transform, but not property arguments. I
> haven't had to use GPSI in a long time since I'm lucky enough to have
> SMS/SCCM for software distribution.
>
>
>
> Hold up and I can write the transform for you pretty quickly.
>
>
>
> *Jamie Nelson* | Infrastructure Consultant | BI&T Operations | Devon
> Energy | Work: 405.552.8054 | http://www.dvn.com
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:59 PM
>
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack
>
>
>
> You would need to either write a transform to make that property
> modification or modify the MSI package directly with a tool like ORCA. There
> is no way to pass property options through GPSI.
>
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Nelson, Jamie
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:55 PM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack
>
>
>
> No I would not do that. Just remove the software install and re-create it
> under computer configuration. You should be able to pass the ALLUSERS=1
> property when you recreate the package. If memory serves me, you can't
> modify the arguments after the package has already been created.
>
>
>
> *Jamie Nelson* | Infrastructure Consultant | BI&T Operations | Devon
> Energy | Work: 405.552.8054 | http://www.dvn.com
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Bobby Benninger
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:40 PM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack
>
>
>
> should i re-create it as per-user instead of per-computer?
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> To add onto this Bobby, it doesn't actually sound like the package
> installed successfully, or at least it is not being activated successfully.
> Did you install it per-user? IF so, did you select to install at first logon
> in the Software Installation UI?
>
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Nelson, Jamie
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:46 AM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack
>
>
>
> Sometimes when you deploy software through Software Installation policy it
> installs in "per-user" mode for the SYSTEM account. I always make sure and
> use the ALLUSERS=1 argument to ensure that scenario doesn't happen.
>
>
>
> *Jamie Nelson* | Infrastructure Consultant | BI&T Operations | Devon
> Energy | Work: 405.552.8054 | http://www.dvn.com
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Bobby Benninger
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:40 PM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack
>
>
>
> I am starting to really hate this MSI.
>
>
>
> Anyway I was having trouble before getting the GPO to apply because of a
> USERENV error in the Application Log, I removed Symantec A/V to resolve this
> error and now the GPO applies correctly.
>
>
>
> Now my problem is that even though the GPO applied and "Office
> Compatibility Pack" shows in add/remove programs, whenever I open a DOCX
> file I get prompted to do download the Compatibility Pack from Microsoft b/c
> its not installed.
>
>
>
> I have read that when you do an assigned software install it doesn't
> actually install the app, just preps it to install the first time you use
> it. Could this be where things are getting caught up, b/c I am not "using
> it" first correctly?
>
>
>
> Let me know what info you need to help troubleshoot. Thanks so much for any
> advice.
>
>
>
>  - Bob
> *
> ------------------------------
> *
>
> *Confidentiality Warning:* This message and any attachments are intended
> only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying,
> circulation or other use of all or any portion of this message and any
> attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this
> message and any attachments from your system.
>
>
>

Other related posts: