[gptalk] Re: Long logon times when switching between metaframe servers.

Hi darren , 
 
I've checked that already but i see no odd values in there. Maybe you can have 
a quick look ? 
 
these are the setting on the metaframe for the extension that gives the 
problem. 
 
 
 
 
 
??? 
 
 
 
 

Vriendelijke groeten,
Cordialement,
Kind Regards, 
Schillebeeks Bart
Active Directory Security Consultant
Bart.schillebeeks@xxxxxxxxxx
AD Internet Consulting BVBA 
"When once you have tasted flight, you will always walk with your eyes turned 
skyward, for there you have been and there you always will be."
Leonardo da Vinci, 1452-1519 
Disclaimer:
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except 
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them 
to be the views of any such entity.This Message is in no way legally binding 
and has to be viewed as a personal opinion of the sender. This message reflects 
in no way the views of FORTIS BANK and its associates and AD internet 
Consulting BVBA and its associates. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing 
information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and 
does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the 
terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and 
subject to our formal written confirmation.

AD Internet Consulting BVBA, Hezemeer 7, 2430 Eindhout-Laakdal ON:0470419019 
www.adinternet.com mailto:Sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


 

________________________________

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 3:21 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Long logon times when switching between metaframe servers.



Bart-

Have you checked to see if there is a policy set to tell registry processing to 
always run even if the policy hasn't changed? The history information that GP 
uses to determine if versions or group memberships have changed is stored 
per-machine and does not roam with the user, so I can understand that policy 
might apply at least once when a user logs into a new machine, but the repeated 
refreshes don't make sense unless something external is forcing that.

 

Darren

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of hans straat
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 4:27 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Long logon times when switching between metaframe servers.

 

Hey Bart yeah a :-) is on it's place been a while since we last talked.
 
As you describe it , it won't be on the server(s) as you said they are all in 
the same OU. Policies shouldn't be loaded again then. 
I hope Darren can figure it out or hint you in the right direction. Are there 
any strange event's in the servers or is it simply user logged on etc blabla.



________________________________

Subject: [gptalk] Re: Long logon times when switching between metaframe servers.
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:20:07 +0200
From: bart.schillebeeks@xxxxxxxxxx
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello Hans :-)

 

All the servers are in the same OU receiving the same gpo's.

 

they logon to the first and recieve all settings

they logon to the second and recieve all settings

they logon to the first again and again recieve all settings!!

 

if they

 

they logon to the first recieve all settings

they logon to the first again  it skippes the settings

 

 

So it happens when switching servers in the same silo and metaframe farm, as we 
have silo's with for example 60 servers in them, this practically means the 
settings are applied all the time.

 

it probably has something to do with the GPO history contained in the 
NTuser.pol file from the roaming profile, but can't figure out how this could 
be fixed.

 

Vriendelijke groeten,
Cordialement,
Kind Regards, 
Schillebeeks Bart
Active Directory Security Consultant
Bart.schillebeeks@xxxxxxxxxx
AD Internet Consulting BVBA 
"When once you have tasted flight, you will always walk with your eyes turned 
skyward, for there you have been and there you always will be."
Leonardo da Vinci, 1452-1519 
Disclaimer:
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except 
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them 
to be the views of any such entity.This Message is in no way legally binding 
and has to be viewed as a personal opinion of the sender. This message reflects 
in no way the views of FORTIS BANK and its associates and AD internet 
Consulting BVBA and its associates. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing 
information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and 
does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the 
terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and 
subject to our formal written confirmation.

AD Internet Consulting BVBA, Hezemeer 7, 2430 Eindhout-Laakdal ON:0470419019 
www.adinternet.com mailto:Sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

________________________________

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of hans straat
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 1:01 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Long logon times when switching between metaframe servers.

As you state they logon to two different servers, does it also happen if they 
logon to two servers in the same OU? Or only if they logon to another farm or 
silo server(s).
 
regards,
hans straat
www.datacrash.net <http://www.datacrash.net/>  




________________________________

Subject: [gptalk] Long logon times when switching between metaframe servers. 
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:40:27 +0200
From: bart.schillebeeks@xxxxxxxxxx
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello, 
I'm a litlle plagued by this annoying problem. Our metaframe people are 
complaining about long logon times for GPO's for certain servers. 
I've studied their userenv logs and found it relates to following behaviour. 
I've got loopback processing enabled with merge, and it merges several more 
restrictive settings when logging on to a metaframe server. 
When a user logs on the first time al his gpo settings are applied which takes 
about 30 seconds, when they logon a second time to the same server their 
settings are marked "same" and the application is skipped. 
This is how it should work obviously.
 Now when they logon to another server in the metaframe farm i see NTuser.pol 
from their profile first erasing all settings in the registry extension part, 
and then reapplying them again from the GPO on the domain. 
Only the registry extension has this behaviour , all the other ones don't do 
this. 
Why does this happen? and why is the gpo history not transferred via the 
roaming profile to another server ? 
Can this be reversed somehow ? 
Even if in userenv it says: "the lists are the same" it still deletes and 
reapplies. 
see example 
USERENV 14:34:43:370    ProcessGPOs     Processing extension Registry   4.906 
USERENV 14:34:43:370    ReadStatus      Read Extension's Previous status 
successfully.  4.906 
USERENV 14:34:43:370    CompareGPOLists The lists are the same. 4.906 
USERENV 14:34:43:370    ProcessGPOList  Entering for extension Registry 4.906 
USERENV 14:34:43:370    UserPolicyCallback      Setting status UI to Applying 
Registry policy...        4.906 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    LogExtSessionStatus     Successfully logged Extension 
Session data      4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    EnterCriticalPolicySectionEx    Entering with timeout 
60000 and flags 0x2       4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    EnterCriticalPolicySectionEx    User critical section 
has been claimed.  Handle = 0x464 4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    EnterCriticalPolicySectionEx    Leaving successfully.   
4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    ResetPolicies   Entering.       4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    SetRegPermissionsOnPoliciesKey  Resetting permission on 
the policy key  4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    SetRegPermissionsOnPoliciesKey  Resetting permission on 
the policy key  4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    ParseRegistryFile       Entering with 
<C:\Profiles\g60057\ntuser.pol>.  4.937 
USERENV 14:34:43:401    DeleteRegistryValue     Deleted 
Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet 
Settings\Zones\3\1001       4.937
USERENV 14:34:43:401    DeleteRegistryValue     Deleted 
Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet 
Settings\Zones\3\1004       4.937
USERENV 14:34:43:401    DeleteRegistryValue     Deleted 
Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet 
Settings\Zones\3\1C00       4.937
USERENV 14:34:43:401    DeleteRegistryValue     Deleted 
Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Control Panel\Autoconfig  4.937
USERENV 14:34:43:401    DeleteRegistryValue     Deleted 
Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Control Panel\Connection Settings 
4.937 
and then the reapplication 
SERENV  14:34:45:886    ParseRegistryFile       Entering with 
<\\int.sys.shared.fortis\sysvol\int.sys.shared.fortis\Policies\{4120ED14-6346-4964-ABCD-F578457BC151}\User\registry.pol>.
 7.422
USERENV 14:34:45:932    SetRegistryValue        NoComponents => 1  [OK] 7.468 
USERENV 14:34:45:995    SetRegistryValue        DisablePersonalDirChange => 1  
[OK]     7.531 
USERENV 14:34:46:057    SetRegistryValue        ForceClassicControlPanel => 1  
[OK]     7.593 
USERENV 14:34:46:104    SetRegistryValue        NoDesktopCleanupWizard => 1  
[OK]       7.640 
USERENV 14:34:46:167    SetRegistryValue        NoHardwareTab => 1  [OK]        
7.703 
USERENV 14:34:46:214    SetRegistryValue        NoManageMyComputerVerb => 1  
[OK]       7.750 
USERENV 14:34:46:276    SetRegistryValue        NoSMConfigurePrograms => 1  
[OK]        7.812 
USERENV 14:34:46:323    SetRegistryValue        NoSMMyPictures => 1  [OK]       
7.859 
normally it should be like this (same user again on same server) 
USERENV 14:12:54:275    ProcessGPOs     Processing extension Registry   1.359 
USERENV 14:12:54:275    ReadStatus      Read Extension's Previous status 
successfully.  1.359 
USERENV 14:12:54:275    CompareGPOLists The lists are the same. 1.359 
USERENV 14:12:54:275    CheckGPOs       No GPO changes and no security group 
membership change and extension Registry has NoGPOChanges set.     1.359
USERENV 14:12:54:275    ProcessGPOs     ----------------------- 1.359 
As we have multiple metaframe's in multiple farms and silo's this actually mean 
that mostly all of these settings are constantly being reapplied costing the 
user 30 seconds every time.
If anyone can shed some light on this it would be greatly appreciated. 
Thanks 


Vriendelijke groeten,
Cordialement,
Kind Regards, 
Schillebeeks Bart
Active Directory Security Consultant
Bart.schillebeeks@xxxxxxxxxx
AD Internet Consulting BVBA 
"When once you have tasted flight, you will always walk with your eyes turned 
skyward, for there you have been and there you always will be."
Leonardo da Vinci, 1452-1519 
Disclaimer:
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except 
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them 
to be the views of any such entity.This Message is in no way legally binding 
and has to be viewed as a personal opinion of the sender. This message reflects 
in no way the views of FORTIS BANK and its associates and AD internet 
Consulting BVBA and its associates. Unless otherwise stated, any pricing 
information given in this message is indicative only, is subject to change and 
does not constitute an offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the 
terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and 
subject to our formal written confirmation.
AD Internet Consulting BVBA, Hezemeer 7, 2430 Eindhout-Laakdal ON:0470419019 
www.adinternet.com mailto:Sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

JPEG image

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Fortis disclaimer :
http://www.fortis.be/legal/disclaimer.htm

Privacy policy related to banking activities of Fortis:
http://www.fortis.be/legal/privacy_policy.htm
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Other related posts: