[gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: "David" <shotgun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:45:51 -0700
Charles, we were actually in the city at a very well known restaurant, at
least for that area. The nearest POI was over a mile away, which would be
very unusual in that case. I also tried to go there in virtual mode and it
doesn't list that city. The next time we are there I'll get the
coordinates, perhaps that would be helpful.
Dave
taxation WITH representation isn't so hot, either!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles La Pierre" <lapierre@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 10:32 AM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
First to us, incase its something with our software. Best thing to do is
if you can actually go to that city either virtually or with GPS and press
C or Space/Ctrl C, it may just be miss named.
To get there virtually when you can't find the city is you pick a city
close by and then virtually move towards the city, or search for POIs for
that city. Maybe the POI city center is there and you can try to get
there that way.
Charles.
At 10:15 AM 4/22/2006, you wrote:
The maps are much improved in 3.5, I have intentionally looked for the
problems I found in 3.3 and they aren't there any more. It must be a heck
of a job to coordinate all of the maps, and I would guess it consumes much
of the time and effort that is put into any new release of map data.
There is a city in Arizona that does not seem to be there though, should
we report things like this to you or directly to TeleAtlas ?
Dave
taxation WITH representation isn't so hot, either!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles La Pierre"
<lapierre@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
Hello everyone,
This has been asked and answered here a number of times but I will try to
explain it again.
Yes we use TeleAtlas maps, but TeleAtlas has maps in GDF format, this is
NOT the format we use on the BrailleNote. We use RMF which is a highly
compressed map format from Telcontar. By going to this highly compressed
format we gain a number of benefits. 1. Size is reduced. 2. Speed to
access the map data is incredibly fast. 3. We also get the Telcontar's
Routing library which creates the routes you all use.
Even if you were to find some other company which would license you maps
in RMF format the city / street lookup is specific to our Sendero GPS
product. So you wouldn't be able to do any address lookups without our
maps. Sendero spent a lot of work fixing a city address map bug from
TeleAtlas just before we released our product. There were hundreds of
cities which were duplicate because the TeleAtlas miss labeled area's
within Cities as real cities. So an area inside of San Jose California
named "Burbank" the software thought you were really in "Burbank"
California which is about 300 miles south of San Jose. So even big map
companies like TeleAtlas make mistakes and Sendero was able to fix this
for you all before we released 3.5. I really hope you all appreciate
just how much work it takes to releasing a product like this, and we care
about getting you all the best possible data as quickly as possible.
I hope this explains why we went with the Telcontar's RMF format. Oh and
by the way, Google Maps, Yahoo Maps, all use maps in Telcontar's RMF
format, so they too have to wait for TeleAtlas to release their maps and
then wait for Telcontar to release the updated filter to convert the GDF
map into RMF and then they can put it up on their website. But Google
and Yahoo are so big and can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on
updating maps, they don't just use TeleAtlas maps alone, they also use
Navtech and maybe others all of which are converted first into Telcontars
Richmap engine. This is why their accuracy seems better because they can
make a highbred of the best maps available. If TeleAtlas has better map
coverage in Texas they use TeleAtlas in Texax, if Navtech has better
coverage in Alabama they use Navtech maps there. I think you get the
point.
Thank you
Charles LaPierre
CTO SenderoGroup
At 02:03 AM 4/22/2006, you wrote:
hi list thanks mike concerning the maps so, could i go on the tele atlas
website and purchase maps which are the most up to date from them and be
able to use them o.k.
i also use the wayfinder program and as you know the maps are used from
the internet meading they are the most up to date.
i asume tele atlas would charge lots more for you to use the licence for
the most up to date maps making braille note gps very expensive.
thanks.
Charles M. La Pierre CTO
Sendero Group, LLC
Lat. 37 15' 25" N Lon: 121 53' 04" W
Charles M. La Pierre CTO
Sendero Group, LLC
Lat. 37 15' 25" N Lon: 121 53' 04" W
- References:
- [gps-talkusers] aps
- From: john gallagher
- [gps-talkusers] why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: Charles La Pierre
- [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: David
- [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: Charles La Pierre
Other related posts:
- » [gps-talkusers] why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- » [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- » [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- » [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
To get there virtually when you can't find the city is you pick a city close by and then virtually move towards the city, or search for POIs for that city. Maybe the POI city center is there and you can try to get there that way.
Charles.
At 10:15 AM 4/22/2006, you wrote:
The maps are much improved in 3.5, I have intentionally looked for the problems I found in 3.3 and they aren't there any more. It must be a heck of a job to coordinate all of the maps, and I would guess it consumes much of the time and effort that is put into any new release of map data.
There is a city in Arizona that does not seem to be there though, should we report things like this to you or directly to TeleAtlas ?
Dave
taxation WITH representation isn't so hot, either!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles La Pierre" <lapierre@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
Hello everyone,
This has been asked and answered here a number of times but I will try to explain it again.
Yes we use TeleAtlas maps, but TeleAtlas has maps in GDF format, this is NOT the format we use on the BrailleNote. We use RMF which is a highly compressed map format from Telcontar. By going to this highly compressed format we gain a number of benefits. 1. Size is reduced. 2. Speed to access the map data is incredibly fast. 3. We also get the Telcontar's Routing library which creates the routes you all use.
Even if you were to find some other company which would license you maps in RMF format the city / street lookup is specific to our Sendero GPS product. So you wouldn't be able to do any address lookups without our maps. Sendero spent a lot of work fixing a city address map bug from TeleAtlas just before we released our product. There were hundreds of cities which were duplicate because the TeleAtlas miss labeled area's within Cities as real cities. So an area inside of San Jose California named "Burbank" the software thought you were really in "Burbank" California which is about 300 miles south of San Jose. So even big map companies like TeleAtlas make mistakes and Sendero was able to fix this for you all before we released 3.5. I really hope you all appreciate just how much work it takes to releasing a product like this, and we care about getting you all the best possible data as quickly as possible.
I hope this explains why we went with the Telcontar's RMF format. Oh and by the way, Google Maps, Yahoo Maps, all use maps in Telcontar's RMF format, so they too have to wait for TeleAtlas to release their maps and then wait for Telcontar to release the updated filter to convert the GDF map into RMF and then they can put it up on their website. But Google and Yahoo are so big and can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on updating maps, they don't just use TeleAtlas maps alone, they also use Navtech and maybe others all of which are converted first into Telcontars Richmap engine. This is why their accuracy seems better because they can make a highbred of the best maps available. If TeleAtlas has better map coverage in Texas they use TeleAtlas in Texax, if Navtech has better coverage in Alabama they use Navtech maps there. I think you get the point.
Thank you Charles LaPierre CTO SenderoGroup
At 02:03 AM 4/22/2006, you wrote:hi list thanks mike concerning the maps so, could i go on the tele atlas website and purchase maps which are the most up to date from them and be able to use them o.k.
i also use the wayfinder program and as you know the maps are used from the internet meading they are the most up to date.
i asume tele atlas would charge lots more for you to use the licence for the most up to date maps making braille note gps very expensive. thanks.
Charles M. La Pierre CTO Sendero Group, LLC
Lat. 37 15' 25" N Lon: 121 53' 04" W
Charles M. La Pierre CTO Sendero Group, LLC
Lat. 37 15' 25" N Lon: 121 53' 04" W
- [gps-talkusers] aps
- From: john gallagher
- [gps-talkusers] why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: Charles La Pierre
- [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: David
- [gps-talkusers] Re: why not buy maps directly from TeleAtlas?
- From: Charles La Pierre