[gps-talkusers] Re: Roundabouts for Charles
- From: "zach home email" <chickerland@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:04:23 -0700
so it currently says to cross 4 roads instead of 1 in his last example? Is
this in version 5.01 or what version is this in?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Bosher" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:23 AM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: Roundabouts for Charles
Many thanks Charles,
Re behaviour for pedestrians: I see what you mean, but if we knew how many
exits there were, then we would know which way to go in order to cross
fewer roads. For example, if it said: "Take the third of four exits, 3
o'clock", then we'd know to cross one road on the right, rather than two
roads on the left.
On a more complex roundabout "Take the sixth of six exits, 4 o'clock", and
we'd know not to cross any roads but take the first one to the right,
rather than crossing five roads round the circle.
This still seems the most practical way to deal with a roundabout as a
pedestrian.
All the best,
Peter
At 03:12 PM 11/27/2008, you wrote:
Hi Peter,
Yes I did see this message and we discussed it internally then we posted
it to our Beta List and got additional feedback. We have added two new
feature requests for vehicle routes which cover your issues you posted
concerning roundabouts. During the next round of development we will
consider these but there is no guaranty your suggestions will make it into
the next release but we have entered these into our bug/feature request
system.
As for your new suggestion about pedestrian routes, I am less willing to
change the current behavior as pedestrians won't know the difference
between on ramps and off ramps from a roundabout and if I say take the 3rd
exit 3 O'clock, does this mean you cross 3 streets or 5 streets, which is
why the current pedestrian routes through roundabouts hasn't been changed.
Thank you
Charles LaPierre
CTO Sendero Group
At 06:37 AM 11/27/2008, you wrote:
Hi Charles,
I sent this message to the list a few weeks back, perhaps while you were
on vacation. There were a few replies in support of my suggestion, and
without meaning to pester you, I'd really appreciate your take on this.
I've added one or two clarifications to my original message, but when you
get a moment, please do let us know what you think.
Original message:
As I was one of those who asked for Sendero to handle roundabouts in a
more usable way, I'd first like to thank Charles and the team for a
terrific job in version 5. I have now done some long car journeys
running Sendero alongside Wayfinder in order to compare how they dealt
with roundabouts, with the emphasis on how useful the instructions are
for the driver, but also taking into account pedestrian use. Sendero is
now definitely usable for this kind of journey and I know how much work
went into this, so a huge thank you.
I do have one suggestion which I think would make for even better
results.
At present, for any roundabout at all, besides the message about which
exit to take, (which is working perfectly) you will hear, either when
browsing or with "Approaching ..." either left turn, ten o'clock turn, or
eleven-o'clock turn. This refers to the actual turn onto the
roundabout, and is entirely unhelpful. It's unhelpful to the driver who
does not think of the turn onto the roundabout as a left turn, and
unhelpful to a pedestrian who does not walk on the roundabout, but rather
needs to work out which intervening roads to cross. Similarly, when on
the roundabout, the exit road will be classed as a left-turn, which is
equally unhelpful.
What I am suggesting is what I have always suggested, but it's hard to
put over in an Email, so let me try just once more.
The information about the turning should refer only to the road you are
to take, in relation to the road you are on before you enter the
roundabout. The roundabout itself should not be treated as a road.
For example, let's say you have a simple four-way roundabout. You are
on road A, and the roundabout joins roads A, B, C and D, going in order
clockwise around the roundabout. If I am to take road B, then that is
the first exit, and a left-turn. If I am to take road C, then that is
the second exit, and an ahead-turn. If I am to take road D, then that
is the third exit, and a right-turn.
This approach could equally well cope with more than four roads, since,
for example, the fourth exit might be a two-o'clock turn, the fifth exit
a four-o'clock turn and so-on, so in this case, it would say
"approaching four-o'clock turn ..." and "turn four-o'clock taking fifth
exit." . The crucial point is to give information about the road you
are to take relative to the road you're on, and never to count the
roundabout itself as a road.
Charles: if you don't agree with this as a possible improvement, please
could you say why not because it seems such a clear-cut simplification
for both vehicle and pedestrian use, but maybe I still haven't managed to
explain it, or am missing something important.
In any case, I'm still absolutely delighted with version 5 so this is a
refinement request, albeit an important one for those countries where
roundabouts really are a big deal.
All the best,
Peter
--
*******
Peter Bosher,
Email: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.soundlinks.com/
Tel': (+44) (0) 1494 794 797
Fax: (+44) (0) 1494 583 146
snail://
SoundLinks Limited,
43 Broadlands Avenue,
Chesham,
Bucks.
HP5 1AL
England.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 3645 (20081127) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Charles M. La Pierre
CTO Sendero Group
"The GPS company:" Featuring Sendero GPS on the BrailleNote as well as
Sense Nav and the new Mobile Geo for Windows Mobile devices. Also
distributing Trekker, Victor Stream, KNFB Mobile Reader, Talks, Mobile
Speak, Tiger embossers, Miniguide and ID Mate
1-888-757-6810
Lat. 37 15' 25" N Lon: 121 53' 04" W
--
*******
Peter Bosher,
Email: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.soundlinks.com/
Tel': (+44) (0) 1494 794 797
Fax: (+44) (0) 1494 583 146
snail://
SoundLinks Limited,
43 Broadlands Avenue,
Chesham,
Bucks.
HP5 1AL
England.
Other related posts: