[gps-talkusers] On/Off topic
- From: "Dave" <dwgordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:13:00 -0700
A week or so ago there was a discussion about to much traffic on this list.
I'm not a moderator so I'm not going to say anything about what's on or off
topic, although I think we are straying quite a bit from GPS here. However,
I'd like to suggest at the very least, that people change the subject to
meet the criteria of what they intend to post so that those of us who don't
need a comparison of different types of audio software used on the web can
see that in the subject line and delete it.
Dave
To read about the next Peace Seekers meeting click on the link below.
http://www.ThePeaceSeekers.org/program/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ann K. Parsons" <akp@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 4:17 AM
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: survey about the chat room
Hi all,
I think you are making this suggestion without truly examining both
software packages and making comparisons which are predicated on the
needs of the Sendero Group. Why go to an inferior software? You
can't push web pages or PowerPoint slides on For-The_People. You
can't use TCScreen if you like. You can't choose between saving text
chat, audio chat or both. The moderator controls are all accessible
with TCConference. Mike needs to have accessible software for his
company. Why exchange a working model for something that doesn't.
Besides, I've heard that For-The_People Chatter Box software isn't
friendly to firewalls.
For-The-People may be convenient for you because you have its
software, but it is *not* designed as a tool for the use of
professionals in the field of training! OPAL doesn't use Chatter Box.
Easi doesn't use Chatter Box. No, friend, your suggestion won't fly,
not in this case. These people want professional software with
features meant for professionals in the business world. They want
software that is capable of producing a multimedia presentation meant
for blind and sighted alike. It's a good suggestion, but it isn't
very practical.
See, if they spend money on acquiring a room for a chat for users, it's
only for that purpose, whereas, the TCConference software could be
used by Sendero for other purposes including: training for
distributors, training for sighted O&M instructors, conferencing with
government and educational officials in developing countries and in
Europe, staff meetings, and any number of other things where
conference software is needed and the ability to make multimedia
presentations is also required.
Sometimes I think when we ask companies to do things, we really don't
think through just exactly what we're asking. That is why it is so
very important for people who are blind to have access to information
via computers. Nothing replaces information, nothing!
Ann P.
--
Ann K. Parsons
email: akp@xxxxxxxxx
WEB SITE: http://home.eznet.net/~akp
Skype: Putertutor
"All that is gold does not glitter.
Not all those who wander are lost." JRRT
- Follow-Ups:
- [gps-talkusers] GPS chatroom, wherefore art thou, chatroom?
- From: Richard Myers
- References:
- [gps-talkusers] survey about the chat room
- From: Michael May
- [gps-talkusers] Re: survey about the chat room
- From: Dennis Schwendtner
- [gps-talkusers] Re: survey about the chat room
- From: Ann K. Parsons
Other related posts:
- » [gps-talkusers] On/Off topic
Hi all,
I think you are making this suggestion without truly examining both software packages and making comparisons which are predicated on the needs of the Sendero Group. Why go to an inferior software? You can't push web pages or PowerPoint slides on For-The_People. You can't use TCScreen if you like. You can't choose between saving text chat, audio chat or both. The moderator controls are all accessible with TCConference. Mike needs to have accessible software for his company. Why exchange a working model for something that doesn't. Besides, I've heard that For-The_People Chatter Box software isn't friendly to firewalls.
For-The-People may be convenient for you because you have its software, but it is *not* designed as a tool for the use of professionals in the field of training! OPAL doesn't use Chatter Box. Easi doesn't use Chatter Box. No, friend, your suggestion won't fly, not in this case. These people want professional software with features meant for professionals in the business world. They want software that is capable of producing a multimedia presentation meant for blind and sighted alike. It's a good suggestion, but it isn't very practical.
See, if they spend money on acquiring a room for a chat for users, it's only for that purpose, whereas, the TCConference software could be used by Sendero for other purposes including: training for distributors, training for sighted O&M instructors, conferencing with government and educational officials in developing countries and in Europe, staff meetings, and any number of other things where conference software is needed and the ability to make multimedia presentations is also required.
Sometimes I think when we ask companies to do things, we really don't think through just exactly what we're asking. That is why it is so very important for people who are blind to have access to information via computers. Nothing replaces information, nothing!
Ann P.
-- Ann K. Parsons email: akp@xxxxxxxxx WEB SITE: http://home.eznet.net/~akp Skype: Putertutor "All that is gold does not glitter. Not all those who wander are lost." JRRT
- [gps-talkusers] GPS chatroom, wherefore art thou, chatroom?
- From: Richard Myers
- [gps-talkusers] survey about the chat room
- From: Michael May
- [gps-talkusers] Re: survey about the chat room
- From: Dennis Schwendtner
- [gps-talkusers] Re: survey about the chat room
- From: Ann K. Parsons