- Why is federal government so secretive? It's classified - Public Libraries Burdened With E-Government Services, Says Florida Study Patrice McDermott, Director OpenTheGovernment.org 202-332-OPEN (6736) www.openthegovernment.org WHY IS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SO SECRETIVE? IT'S CLASSIFIED EDITORIAL Austin-American Statesman http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/09/28/28intelligence_edit.html Thursday, September 28, 2006 President Bush's pique at having to surrender some of a report by our American intelligence agencies assessing the war on terror will undoubtedly be interpreted in predictable â and wrong â ways. Of course, our commander in chief is distressed, his finger-wagging supporters say. He had to give up the innermost secrets of our war on terror to our enemies after traitors in his own administration leaked some of them to the equally traitorous press. [â] What you won't find in this report, with or without a decoder ring, is a single state secret, a single nugget of information that, in the wrong hands, could mean our nation's doom. The content of the report makes it abundantly clear the president should have released it in the first place. It ought to make every American, regardless of political stripe, wonder what made the president so angry. Here is an informed guess, based on past performance: From the day he took office, long before Sept. 11, 2001, this president has been on a single-minded mission to control the flow of government information by keeping it from the public. From 1953 to 1976, through the heart of the Cold War, six presidents chose to invoke the privilege to classify a document a state secret a total of six times, according to an annual report card on government secrecy by nonpartisan analysts OpenTheGovernment.org. Bush has done it 22 times since 2001. Bush has nearly doubled the number of government-produced documents he classifies annually, according to the report card. He has chosen to declassify four times fewer documents than his predecessor, President Clinton, did in his last year in office, the report says. Americans, in turn, have more than doubled their requests under the Freedom of Information Act over the past six years to more than 4.1 million and at an estimated cost to process of $7.7 billion. [â] â There was almost certainly a political motive for those in the administration who leaked selected and damning parts of the intelligence assessment to the newspapers. But the decidedly nonsensitive content of the assessment itself suggests a political motive in the president's decision to classify it. This is not to suggest that there is nothing that should be kept secret in a time of war. The president withheld the full text of the intelligence report, presumably for national security reasons. But the president damages any case for classifying material with a knee-jerk secrecy that demonstrates only contempt for free, open and, above all, informed debate. *** PUBLIC LIBRARIES BURDENED WITH E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES, SAYS FLORIDA STUDY http://www.govtech.net/magazine/channel_story.php?id=101254 Public libraries need more funding as they are increasingly becoming de facto e-government sites for everything from disaster relief to medical drug plans By News Release Public libraries need more funding as they are increasingly becoming de facto e-government sites for everything from disaster relief to medical drug plans, according to a new Florida State University study, from Tallahassee, Fla. Government agencies are now referring people to public libraries for access and assistance with online services, a trend that is perceived by many librarians as both an opportunity and an unfunded mandate, said FSU College of Information Professor John Carlo Bertot who, along with FSU Francis Eppes Professor Charles R. McClure, research associate Lesley Langa and Paul T. Jaeger of the University of Maryland, conducted the 2006 national "Public Libraries and the Internet Survey." The final report on the study will be posted Oct. 1 at http://www.ii.fsu.edu/plinternet/. [...] To control their own costs, federal and state agencies are shifting the burden of e-government to public libraries with little regard for the impact on these front-line service providers." About 64 percent of the 4,818 library personnel who responded to the survey indicated that their information technology budgets were not increased over the previous year, and 5 percent said the technology budgets were actually cut, Bertot said. While 45 percent of the respondents said their library did receive an increase in operating funds, nearly all of those funds went to salaries and benefits. [...] Knowing some clients do not have Internet access, many government agencies send them to public libraries to apply for benefits and complete forms that are available only online. Even when they don't need a computer, many people are going to public libraries for help in understanding government services, as the survey respondents said was the case last year with the new mandatory Medicare prescription drug coverage plans. Many librarians said they have become ad hoc experts on everything from student loan applications to tax documents, but others indicated they need more training if they are going to help members of the community with these types of government services. Libraries also are increasingly being called upon to provide disasterrelief, a function that is causing additional strain on resources, Bertot said. The survey found that almost all libraries provide expanded Internet access to emergency service providers and the public during disasters, such as hurricanes. In addition, many libraries are being used as shelters, and one library in Florida actually runs the emergency call center during disasters. Some libraries have tried to respond to the increased demand by adding more public computers and wireless access for those who can bring their own laptops, but the lack of money, space and technology support has hindered their efforts, Bertot said. Still, the survey indicated that more than 36 percent of libraries now have wireless access. [...] The study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the American Library Association.