FYI. Please send your sign-ons to Amy Fuller afuller at openthegovernment.org . Patrice McDermott OpenTheGovernment.org From: Amy Alyce Fuller [mailto:afuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:59 PM To: FOI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: SIGN-ON by COB 6/2 - Letter to OPM re: FOIA Personnel Policies In December 2008, as required by the OPEN Government Act, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released a report regarding personnel policies for FOIA professionals. Below is a letter for sign-on drafted by the National Security Archive requesting OPM reconsider the report in light of the new administration?s commitment to transparency. In particular, the letter urges OPM to gather additional input from the key stakeholders, including a range of agencies and professional societies, before making any further recommendations. To add your organization, please respond directly to me by COB Tuesday, June 2. Thanks, Amy Fuller OpenTheGovernment.org ******* The Honorable John Berry Director United States Office of Personnel Management Theodore Roosevelt Federal Building 1900 E Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20415-0001 Dear Mr. Berry: The undersigned organizations and individuals concerned with government transparency write to request that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) reconsider and revise its December 16, 2008, report issued pursuant to Section 11 of the OPEN Government Act of 2007. The OPEN Government Act directed OPM to provide recommendations to Congress for improving personnel practices for employees who administer the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in the federal government. The report issued by OPM falls short of Congress? intentions and the expectations of both government FOIA professionals and members of the public who regularly file FOIA requests. On his first day in office, President Obama ?usher[ed] in a new era of openness? and committed his administration to greater transparency and accountability. Without qualified, committed FOIA personnel, these promises will not be realized. The December 16 report fails to recommend any action by OPM, but rather suggests a continuation of the status quo. Although many of the current problems with FOIA administration lie with the agencies, OPM has leadership over personnel policies government-wide. OPM?s own mission, as described on its Web site, includes ?[c]hampioning the Federal workforce,? ?[a]ttracting and developing the best people for Federal service,? ?[e]ncouraging professional development and recognition opportunities,? and ?[a]dvocating for innovating human resources practices.? OPM can take action to raise the caliber of the FOIA workforce, attract and maintain trained individuals in FOIA positions, and compel other federal employees to consider information disclosure as part of their job description. OPM should fulfill its mission and discharge its statutory obligations by devoting necessary attention to the unique needs of FOIA professionals, and the public at large that they serve. OPM should issue a revised report that seriously examines ?how FOIA can be better implemented at the agency level? by improving the standing and consideration of agency FOIA professionals in the personnel system. We also call on OPM to gather additional input from the key stakeholders before making any further recommendations pursuant to the OPEN Government Act mandate. The report states that OPM staff met with FOIA officials from two agencies. OPM should consult with a range of agencies?those with FOIA programs that are smaller, larger, centralized, and decentralized? and consider the issues and ideas raised by agencies in their FOIA Improvement Plans, submitted to the Department of Justice in 2006 pursuant to Executive Order 13,392, and subsequent reports on implementation of the executive order, which describe the FOIA personnel and resource challenges agencies face. In addition to meeting with a wide range of agencies, OPM should consult as well as with representatives from the American Society of Access Professionals (ASAP), an independent organization for FOIA and privacy professionals. OPM should also seek input from members of the FOIA requester and advocacy community, who interact with agency FOIA personnel on a daily basis and understand the implications of neglecting professional development and support for FOIA staff on government transparency and accountability. We appreciate your attention to these issues, and we look forward to working with you on developing new recommendations for improving FOIA personnel practices. Representatives of our organizations would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss our requests in more detail. Sincerely, The National Security Archive OpenTheGovernment.org