[gmpi] Re: where we at
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: GMPI Mailing list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:11:13 +0100
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:04:17 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Obviously no one wants to discuss this any more. I think we're pretty close
> to an A or B or nothing at all decision.
>
> Should we debate merits again, or who is willing to bend? I'm willing to
> bend to the group will. I'll be happy with some form of C, or A.
I think most people are in that situation, its a simple binary question and
we know both can work, so why dont we just vote?
++A from me.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: where we at
- From: Jeff McClintock
- References:
- [gmpi] where we at
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- » [gmpi] Re: where we at
- [gmpi] Re: where we at
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] where we at
- From: Tim Hockin