[gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:34:00 -0700
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:35:00AM +1200, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> Yeah, there has been, I feel, excessive concern about the complexities
> of using QueryInterface() etc. As a plugin coder, you don't deal with
> it directly.
As a plugin coder, you may want to support multiple versions of the API.
using QueryInterface for API versioning means that you *will* have to be
aware of it, doesn't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Jeff McClintock
- References:
- [gmpi] ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Jeff McClintock
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- » [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- » [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- » [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- » [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- » [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- » [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
- From: Jeff McClintock