[gmpi] Re: ok, who is NOT "too busy"?

From: Mike Berry <mberry@xxxxxxxxx>
To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:38:02 -0600

Once we get a little further into coding I will have some more to say. For the true underneath plumbing things seem to be going in the right direction, except that I think that people's worries about complexity of the plumbing are misplaced. Very few authors will ever see the plumbing - they will be working at a framework level above the plumbing.

Tim Hockin wrote:

Is anyone here not "too busy" for this project?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

--
Mike Berry
Adobe Systems

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:

[gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
From: Jeff McClintock

References:
- [gmpi] ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?
  - From: Tim Hockin

[gmpi] Re: ok, who is *NOT* "too busy"?

Other related posts:

[gmpi] Re: ok, who is NOT "too busy"?