[gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:38:22 -0700
Be sure you include a copyright notice in all files, then, along the
lines of the following:
/* Copyright (c) 2003, 2004 by Tom Hockin and Jeff McClintock */
-- Chris G.
Tim said:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:20:45AM -0400, Ron Kuper wrote:
I want to make sure we are careful about the whole copyright issue. Any
code that's released needs to be (c) something, so that if we ultimately
transfer the whole ball of wax to some other copyright holder there is a
clear transfer. Any thoughts about who should own the initial copyright
to what Tim proposes to publish?
Right now it is 99% Jeff and I who own it. We can leave it as such until
we have a better answer, with a license that makes it clear that ownership
might be transferred to another party.
Also, Chris Grigg pointed out to me that we ought to put verbiage in all
code to indicate that it isn't official GMPI yet. He suggested a
boilerplate like this:
Fine with me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Ron Kuper
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
I want to make sure we are careful about the whole copyright issue. Any code that's released needs to be (c) something, so that if we ultimately transfer the whole ball of wax to some other copyright holder there is a clear transfer. Any thoughts about who should own the initial copyright to what Tim proposes to publish?
Right now it is 99% Jeff and I who own it. We can leave it as such until we have a better answer, with a license that makes it clear that ownership might be transferred to another party.
Also, Chris Grigg pointed out to me that we ought to put verbiage in all code to indicate that it isn't official GMPI yet. He suggested a boilerplate like this:
Fine with me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Ron Kuper
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Tim Hockin