[gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:56:04 -0700
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:20:45AM -0400, Ron Kuper wrote:
> I want to make sure we are careful about the whole copyright issue. Any
> code that's released needs to be (c) something, so that if we ultimately
> transfer the whole ball of wax to some other copyright holder there is a
> clear transfer. Any thoughts about who should own the initial copyright
> to what Tim proposes to publish?
Right now it is 99% Jeff and I who own it. We can leave it as such until
we have a better answer, with a license that makes it clear that ownership
might be transferred to another party.
> Also, Chris Grigg pointed out to me that we ought to put verbiage in all
> code to indicate that it isn't official GMPI yet. He suggested a
> boilerplate like this:
Fine with me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Chris Grigg
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Ron Kuper
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- » [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: moving forward
- From: Ron Kuper