[gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:30:22 -0700
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 09:10:43AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:57:52 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> >
> >
> > 3.13. Latency
> >
> > Req 60: GMPI plugins must report their latency when queried by the
> > host. Plugins may change their latency only when they are queried by the
> > host, and hosts may query or not, as they see fit.
> >
> > Any objections?
>
> Dont think so, this would be satisfied by having a well-known output port,
> right?
Possibly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Steve Harris
Other related posts:
- [gmpi] lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: lost-n-found #2 latency
- From: Steve Harris