[gmpi] Re: conventions opinions

On Tuesday, March 08, 2005 10:15 AM [GMT+1=CET],
David Olofson <xxxdavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I agree. It doesn't seem to make sense to try to "hide" (or whatever
> this is about) the inlines and templates, since once you decide to
> use inlines and templates in the API, you have to accept that
> whatever these depend on invariably becomes part of the public API.

Of course. I guess it's just because you don't get thrown all the details in
your face when trying to figure out how to use a certain header file. Of
course the #included files will need to be publically visible too. The
hiding is not in the sense that you cannot know what's going on, it's in the
sense that you usually don't want to see that mixed between the important
things (the member function signatures with their docs). That's what I
wanted to say.
And in any case,  we're not even sure the API will have inline/template
stuff.
Koen


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: