[gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:07:10 -0800
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:35:24PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:04:27PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I think its fine to say all real valued controls will be ramped, but you
> > can ignore the ramps if you have to.
>
> I guess all this really is too detailed for requirements. All we need to
> say NOW is that GMPI must support ramped controls for real-number controls.
> Mandatory/optional and implementation details are not ours to make right
> now.
So I said this a couple weeks ago, then did not listen to myself.
My latest CVS edit is here:
http://www.gmpi-plugins.org/gmpi/requirements.php
However, I want to make a few changes. I think we've gotten too technical
on these reqs. We (myself as a prime offender) need to not do that.
So look over the doc, then read my revision suggestions below. i want to
close this topic soon, PLEASE :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V
A couple revision suggestions, since real details are not for us to decide.
R22 is ok
R23 is ok
R24:
"Event timestamps must be measured in sample frames."
More on this requirement:
"Based on GMPI working group discussion, the preferred timestamp
semantic is a sample frame offset from the start of the time slice."
R25:
"GMPI must support ramped or smoothed events. Ramping or smoothing
must be supported on at least real number typed controls."
More on this requirement:
..include some of the meat we've been discussing...
R26: is ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- » [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Chris Grigg
- [gmpi] Re: closing reqs 3.8
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - ramped events
- From: Tim Hockin