[gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
> >>>
> A single datatype is not sufficient to support all the platforms we need to
> support. In very general terms, a plugin needs to identify the datatype it
> is expects for I/O. Is that a fair enough summary?
> <<<
>
> Yes.
>
> >>>
> Now the next part: Is it a REQUIREMENT to support plugins with more than
> one I/O type? That is - different input type vs output type, or different
> per-{pin,channel,stream,whatever}?
> <<<
>
> No. One type per binary deliverable is fine.
Ron, thanks for answering. Anyone else care? Otherwise I am going to
propose this as the answer to this section and suggest we move on? Anyone?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- From: RonKuper
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Where are we, again?
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we, again?
- From: RonKuper