[gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- From: "B.J. Buchalter" <bj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:57:46 -0400
on 6/18/03 10:24 AM, Steve Harris at S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:47:27AM -0400, B.J. Buchalter wrote:
>> We have not tested the modular synth type of graph, so I am not really
>> speaking to that specific operation but I have tested things like IIR filter
>> implementations where I can measure significant differences in noise floor
>> structure and in listening tests that has a real impact on the sound (the 64
>> bit implementation is smoother and other weird subjective kind of words). So
>
> Yes, I'd agree with that entirely, but GMPI is not indended to support
> blockless or recusive processing models, so that is a non issue. The
> intermal procision can be whatever you like, its just the external i/o
> were discussing here.
I understand. Again, there are claims of the need. I am not sure that it is
needed (by me), but I have seen signal processing chains that do need it
(internally in our plugs), so I am not willing to dismiss it out of hand.
There are systems today that currently implement wide I/O (Sonic Solutions,
for example).
Best regards,
B.J. Buchalter
Metric Halo
M/S 601 - Building 8
Castle Point Campus
Castle Point, NY 12511-0601 USA
tel +1 845 831-8600
fax +1 603 250-2451
If you haven't heard ChannelStrip yet, you don't know what you're missing!
Check out SpectraFoo, ChannelStrip and Mobile I/O at http://www.mhlabs.com/
Download a 12 day demo from <http://www.mhlabs.com/demo/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- From: Steve Harris
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2/Untangling issues
- From: Steve Harris