[gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:55:24 +1200
Cheers Tim,
I'm probly worrying too much....I'll try to be more open minded on the issue
of Profiles.
So what have we decided?
Jeff M
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:28 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
> > My main point is, from the plugin's point-of-view. Enforcing a single
> > datatype, or enforcing a profile, is exactly the same thing (one
datatype
> > per plugin).
>
> Yes - so far. The usefulness of profiles has yet to be determined. As
> Chris points out, it MAY be useful to lump other things into a profile
> umbrella.
>
> > I'm just saying, you are adding an unnessesary layer of abstraction.
> > Profile=datatype. Why complicate it.
>
> It hasn't ben proven unnecessary. The advantage that I see to it would be
> to keep out options that are technically not useful from introducing
> potential incompatibilities between hosts and plugs.
>
> It's roughly the same as saying all plugins MUST support non-interleaved
and
> plugins MAY support interleaved. Hosts are guaranteed to support
> non-interleaved, so plugins will work. If we made them both be MAY
> requirements, then hosts MUST support both, or face incompatible plugins.
>
> IMHO, one of the WORST things we can do is give developers enough wiggle
> room to make their GMPI plugs break on some hosts. The minimum feature
set
> needs to be a MUST.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Where are we?: 7.1.2
- From: Tim Hockin