[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging

> 
> i surely agree, this is likely to apply more in certain market 
> segments than others, and as you say below this is not going to be 
> used by the vast majority of music production DAW or MIDI+Audio 
> sequencer consumers, but then again the G in GMPI stands for 
> 'Generalized,' and film mix stages, and home theatre consumer 
> electronics equipment for that matter, do fall within our project 
> scope. And are important to host companies -- e.g. a large fraction 
> of the ProTools (& of course Avid) installed base is in the film 
> audio post editing & mixing industry.

> Fair enough if in your applications you don't want or need to deal 
> with that, but others might, and say they do.  Designed right, an 
> encoding representation scheme wouldn't complicate implementation for 
> plugs that don't care to use it.

OK.  I'm willing to conced that, then.  Assuming we go the way of enumerated
formats, we'll just let the list grow as needed.  My ignorance WRT encodings
was holding me back.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: