[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 05:46:04 -0700
Title: [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio
packaging
David wrote:
Tim wrote:
> ...The buffers would still be mono
(assuming non-interleaved, which I
> think is pretty well decided). But a connection would have
N
> buffers together. Your stereo connection would have two
channels
> and 5.1 would have 6. The enumerated format just tells the
host
> some semantics about those channels.
Ah, so it's *only* about connection negotiation?
I hope we're not talking about actual structures at the "DSP
level".
Pins/ports or whatever we call them
should always be mono, IMO.
I think the 'pin' and 'port' terminology is obfuscating our
communication... unsurprisingly, since we haven't yet defined those
terms ;-). Inside, a multichannel connection
point/port/pin is in all cases (here I presume there is final
agreement on non-interleaving:) a bundle of mono buffers.
It's also a semantic distinction as to how separate things
actually are at the DSP level, since for example in a 5.1 ring
modulator the six buffers of the carrier input are processed as a
bundle in one way, and (assuming a mono modulator input) the one
buffer of the modulator input is processed as a separate bundle in a
different way. From that POV, it's not seven independent mono
inputs to the DSP code.
We
could have elaborate XML descriptions or
whatever to figure out how
to connect things, but I don't see any need to bring it down to
the
low (ie process() call) levels of the
API.
Gak! Please nothing at the API level that needs to be
parsed! Think instead of an enum used throughout GMPI, with one
value per multichanel format, as a pin property that the plug
advertises to the host at connection time. For expansion &
futureproofing, maybe we have two fields: the
gmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID (the enum) and a separate NumBuffers
(redundant to the enum, but always provided anyway). To address
open-ended user-configurable formats, let's make the first enum value
be kGmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID_BagOfChannels.
As someone else said, there could be a standard
'GmpiMultichannelFormats.Config' file format for hosts, defining the
available gmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID values, with the number of
channels and channel labels & hint values for each format (and
actually XML wouldn't be a bad choice for that*), but the host would
only read that at launch time; by plug connection time, it would all
be boiled down to binary, and at process() time it would in most cases
be completely irrelevant. Plugs can only conform to format
definitions available at the time they're written; so all the config
file can do is help older hosts keep up with new plugs, and provide a
standard mechanism for distributing new official format
definitions.
--
Chris
* Like so?:
<(insert DTD reference here)>
<gmpiMultichannelAudioFormatList>
<formatDefinition ID="0" Name="Bag of
Channels" /
<!-- NumChanels varies on a case-by-case
basis --> /
<!-- Always take from numBuffers field
-->
NumChannels="undefined" /
Symbol
="kGmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID_BagOfChannels"
>
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="(use channel index)"
Label="(use channel index)" /
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_BagChannel" Hint=
"0">
</formatDefinition>
<formatDefinition ID="1"
Name="Mono" /
NumChannels="1"
/
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID_Mono"
>
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="0"
Label="Mono"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_Mono" Hint=
"1">
</formatDefinition>
<formatDefinition ID="2"
Name="Stereo" /
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID_Stereo" /
NumChannels="2"
>
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="0"
Label="Left"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_Stereo_Left" Hint= "2">
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="1"
Label="Right"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_Stereo_Right" Hint= "3">
</formatDefinition>
....
<formatDefinition ID="15"
Name="5.1" /
NumChannels="6"
/
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioFormatID_5_1
>
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="0" Label="Front
Left"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_5_1_FrontLeft"
Hint= "37">
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="1" Label="Front
Center"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_5_1_FrontCenter" Hint=
"38">
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="2" Label="Front
Right"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_5_1_FrontRight"
Hint= "39">
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="3" Label="Rear
Left"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_5_1_RearLeft" Hint= "40">
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="4" Label="Rear
Right"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_5_1_RearRight"
Hint= "41">
<channelDefinition bufferIndex="5" Label="Low
Frequency"
Symbol="kGmpiMultichannelAudioChannel_5_1_LowFreq" Hint= "42">
</formatDefinition>
...
</gmpiMultichannelAudioFormatList>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: David Olofson
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- » [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
> think is pretty well decided). But a connection would have N
> buffers together. Your stereo connection would have two channels
> and 5.1 would have 6. The enumerated format just tells the host
> some semantics about those channels.
Ah, so it's *only* about connection negotiation?
I hope we're not talking about actual structures at the "DSP level".
to connect things, but I don't see any need to bring it down to the
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: David Olofson